• Guest Blogger, Personal Injury

    Posted on March 26th, 2012

    Written by

    Don’t be a Victim – Contact an Attorney

    Injuries can be inconvenient, but can also damage more than you might expect if the injury is serious enough. Unexpected consequences of an injury can be a detriment to your daily life, and can also set you back in terms of career, family, and goal achievement. Injuries can also cause psychological distress and emotional trauma. When you are injured, whether on the slopes, on the job, during a medical operation, or in a car accident, you may need to find someone to help you.  Many people with injuries wonder when it is right to contact a personal injury lawyer to help them offset some of the negative effects of their injuries.

    How Much Will it Cost?

    This question can be a difficult one for many because of financial reasons. Hiring an attorney can be expensive, so some shy away from that option because they are concerned that a personal injury attorney may take from them, with little result. This stigma is often counteracted by attorneys who charge after the settlement is finished, and the case has been won. In reality, consulting and hiring lawyers for your injury, especially for severe injuries, can be much less expensive than dealing with your expenses and life damages on your own.

    Your Fault?

    Many people feel bad about filing a personal injury claim, because they feel ashamed or guilty about taking money or attempting to start a law suit. Although law suits, and especially personal injury law suits, have a negative connotation in our society, it is still important to contact an attorney to see what, if anything, can be done for your specific situation. If you feel guilty, ask yourself if your guilt is worth suffering without assistance, without someone to fight for your rights, and without the potential financial benefits that could help you pay your medical expenses, and the other people you will need to hire to address your injury, such as your physical therapist, doctor, chiropractor, dentist, psychologist, orthopedic surgeon, x-ray specialist, and a host of other professionals depending on the injury.

    Your Costs

    Many people who do not file personal injury claims on the outset regret it later, after thousands of dollars of medical bills and missed work. If your injury is costing you money and valuable time, and even if it is just a slight pain that may worsen, then there is nothing frivolous about attempting to counteract your injury’s negative consequences. Medical appointments, x-rays, and surgeries are extremely expensive, and the costs of an injury can start to take a toll on your finances and overall quality of life, especially if you are unable to work or have limited mobility as a result of your injury. Contacting a personal injury lawyer as soon as possible will help you start off-setting some of the financial setbacks earlier, since cases often take a very long time to complete.

    Timing

    In fact, you should consider talking to an attorney in the weeks immediately after your accident if possible, in order to gain the best counsel, and the most compensation. When you contact an attorney for legal assistance sooner rather than later, not only will the details of your accident be more fresh in your mind, but it will be obvious to judge and potential jury that you were concerned with your situation enough to take action.

    However, some symptoms of injury are late to present themselves, and even broken bones can appear through pain months after an accident. If you do not feel very much discomfort I the early stages of your injury, and don’t contact a personal injury attorney right away, you can still do so for up to three years in most places. According to the experts, after three years has passed it will be much more difficult, if not impossible, to receive any compensation from your personal injury claim.

    Any time in the first three years after your accident is the “right time” to contact a personal injury attorney to help you maintain your way of life, and to decrease as many negative setbacks as possible. You deserve to be protected, and you should not have to deal with your injury alone.

    The firm of Price Benowitz, LLP believes that everyone deserves appropriate reparations for injury or personal loss resulting from the actions of others. Don’t be a victim. Contact a Maryland personal injury lawyer today for a free consultation.

    Share
  • Car Accidents, Personal Injury, Vehicle Accident Injury

    Posted on March 26th, 2012

    Written by

    Distracted Driving Accidents Down with New Cell Phone Use Law

    Since California passed a law in 2008, banning the use of hand-held cell phones by motorists, there has been a substantial reduction in the number of accidents caused by cell phone use while driving.

    New research conducted by the University Of California Berkeley’s Safe Transportation Research and Education Center, considered accident data in California 2 years before the law was passed, and monitored statistics 2 years after the law. They found that traffic accident fatality rates dropped by approximately 22% before the law went into effect.  In comparison, accident fatalities linked to cell phone use while driving dropped by 47%.

    Any Sherman Oaks personal injury lawyer would find those statistics encouraging.  The numbers should also go a long way in defecting criticism against these laws.  Much of the criticism, including that leveled by Sherman Oaks car accident lawyers  is that these laws are not as effective as they could be, because of the pitifully low penalties involved.

    The fine for violating the law banning hand-held cell phone use while driving is $20 for a first offense.  For a 2nd offense, a motorist may be fined a grand total of $50.  These fines are very low, and Sherman Oaks car accident attorneys believe that increasing the penalties could increase adherence to these laws.  Lawmakers tried to introduce legislation that would dramatically increase penalties for violators of the cell phone ban, but the proposals had little support.

    However, this research only considered accidents linked to cell phone use while driving, and did not include the distracted driving-related accidents that occur every year because of other activities.  Motorists may be distracted because they are snacking or applying makeup at the wheel, fiddling with music channels, or having conversations with passengers.  Drivers need to focus on the task of driving in order to reduce the risk of accidents.

     

     

     

    Share
  • Sexual Abuse

    Posted on March 25th, 2012

    Written by

    California Child Care Worker Convicted of Sexual Abuse

    A former Rancho Santa Margarita childcare worker was convicted last week of the molestation of 2 young boys.  The molestation occurred in 2000 and 2006, and the worker was an employee of the Saddleback Unified School District. For 6 years, Christensen worked as a childcare leader at the Learning Connection, an after-school childcare program conducted by the Saddleback Valley Unified School District.

    In 2008, he had been convicted of one of the charges against him involving a six-year-old child who he used to babysit.  However, the jury in that case deadlocked on another charge, in which he was accused of improperly touching another boy’s genitals while watching a movie.

    Prosecutors then refiled the charges related to those incidents, and also asked other victims abused by Christensen to come forward.  That led to revelations that he had improperly touched another boy on an occasion between May 2000 and August 2004.  In this occasion, the boy was abused while watching a movie.

    Last week, a jury convicted him of 3 felony counts of performing lewd acts on a child.  He is also eligible for sentencing enhancements for substantial sexual conduct with a child and committing sexual acts against more than one victim.  He will also have to register in a federal sex offender registry for life.  Los Angeles sexual abuse lawyers believe that Christensen will be sentenced to 55 years to life.

    Child care and day care is as much a requirement as food and clothing for many working parents in California.  Unfortunately, this also means that pedophiles and sex offenders find day care and childcare center facilities chock full of opportunities for them.  These facilities are often targeted by sex offenders for employment.  It’s not just childcare workers and support staff who may be likely to abuse children, but also visitors to the center.

    Share
  • Personal Injury

    Posted on March 18th, 2012

    Written by

    Newport Beach Moves to Ban Fire Pits

    California fire pit injury lawyers have long been aware of the health and safety hazards from these fire rings.  Now, the Newport Beach City Council has voted to eliminate fire pits within city limits.  Under the decision, all 60 fire rings which currently exist at the Big Corona Sate Beach and Balboa will be removed due to the risk of injuries from these fire pits.

    It was a decision that was supported by a majority of the city’s residents.  Out of the 29 members of the public who turned up to comment on the pending rule, only 9 were in favor of allowing the fire pits to remain in place.

    The biggest concern that the Council members had with the fire pits was the safety hazard to people who may be at risk of suffering burn injuries when they fall into or step into a fire pit.  Children may be in special danger of suffering second and third-degree burns from the burning embers in these fire pits.  In 2009, estimates from the University of California Irvine Medical Center revealed that 2nd and 3rd degree burn injuries involving beach and camp fire pits were at a four-year high. The Newport Beach City Council has also been concerned about the effect of air quality from the burning fire rings.

    However, it will be several months, before the fire pits completely disappear.  The California Coastal Commission must give its approval before the pits can be eliminated.  The California Coastal Commission will first hold a public hearing, and that process will take at least a few weeks.

    The decision by the Newport Beach City Council came after the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission analyzed the rings, and recommended that the rings be removed. The Newport Beach decision does indicate to California fire pit injury lawyers that more cities in California will now consider banning these fire pits, in view of the injury risks, especially to children.

    Share
  • Motorcycle Accidents, Personal Injury

    Posted on March 18th, 2012

    Written by

    Motorcyclist Killed in San Diego Truck Accident

    Any Los Angeles truck accident lawyer would be alarmed at the increase in truck accident fatalities in California and the rest of the country, after a couple of years of declining fatalities.  Yet another fatality was added to the toll list in 2012.  Last week, a motorcyclist in San Diego was killed when his motorcycle crashed into a truck on the San Diego 405 freeway.

    The motorcyclist suffered serious injuries, and died at the scene.  Investigations into the accident have begun.  There is no information about the cause of the accident, or whether alcohol was a factor here.

    Earlier this year, the Department of Transportation confirmed that truck accident fatality rates were back on the upswing in 2011.  Final figures for last year are not yet in, but when those numbers come in, it’s expected that there could be an increase of as much as 9% in trucking accident fatalities last year.

    Some of the increase in accident fatalities can be attributed to the fact that freight activity has picked up again after a lull.  That has meant more numbers of trucks on our roadways, placing them in close proximity to smaller vehicles.  Occupants of smaller vehicles may be at a much higher risk of injuries when their vehicles are involved in accidents with tractor-trailers.  In fact, it is estimated that approximately 80% of all auto accidents, involve occupants of the smaller vehicle involved in the crash.

    A truck accident claim in California can include not just the driver of the truck, but also the trucking company.  Additionally, a Los Angeles truck accident attorney may want to name truck repair and maintenance companies in a claim, if the accident was the result of defective parts or poor repairs.  If the accident was the result of a dangerous or unsafe highway, then the city, county or state agency responsible for the maintenance of the roadway can be held responsible in a claim.

    Share
  • Car Accidents, Personal Injury

    Posted on March 12th, 2012

    Written by

    One-Third of All Car Accident Deaths Linked to Speeding

    In spite of improved safety technology, and in spite of the fact that there are now fewer overall traffic accident deaths  there has been no reduction in the number of people being killed every year in speeding-related accidents.  According to the Governors Highway Safety Association, 1/3rd of all auto accident deaths are linked to speeding.

    In 2010 alone, 10,530 people were killed as a result of speeding-related accidents.  The Governors Highway Safety Association is drawing attention to the fact that there has been no drop in the number of speeding-related fatalities over the past 3 decades.

    That is in spite of the fact that seatbelt usage rates around the country have risen to record highs.  Additionally, modern cars now come with a number of safety technologies that reduce the risk of accidents.  There are also fewer drunk drivers on our roads than there were a couple of decades ago.

    All those safety advances have meant an overall drop in the number of auto accident fatalities in the country.  However, there has been no drop in the number of people being killed in speeding-related accidents.

    San Francisco car accident lawyers believe that part of the reason for this is that speeding as an accident factor has partially receded from public consciousness.  Over the past few decades, we have seen a spotlight on reducing the number of fatal accidents caused by alcohol use.  That led to a dramatic decline in the number of these accidents.  Recently, there has been a major focus on preventing accidents caused by distracted driving.

    As a result, there has been very little attention paid to reducing speed limits, better speed enforcement or increasing awareness about the need to drive not just at posted speed limits, but also at speeds that are safe for traffic and weather conditions.

    Share
  • Drug Injury, Personal Injury

    Posted on March 12th, 2012

    Written by

    Actos Manufacturer Concealed Congestive Heart Failure Cases

    A new whistleblower lawsuit filed in a federal court, accuses Takeda Pharmaceuticals of concealing hundreds of cases of congestive heart failure linked to the use of its diabetes drug, Actos.  These cases were from between 2007 – 2010 and in all these cases, the patients did not die and did not require hospitalization.

    According to the whistleblower complaint filed by Helen Ge, Takeda Pharmaceuticals did not provide information about these congestive heart failure cases from the use of Actos, to safety regulators.  In 2007, the Food and Drug Administration ordered Takeda Pharmaceuticals to include a warning on its Actos `packaging, warning users about the risk of congestive heart failure with the use of the anti-diabetes drug.

    However, according to the whistleblower lawsuit, the company failed to provide information about the congestive heart failure cases where patients did not die or were not hospitalized.  The aim was to project Actos as being safer than its closest competitor at the time, GlaxoSmithKline’s Avandia.

    Avandia has also struggled with a number of safety concerns, and its sales are now restricted in the United States.  Both Actos and Avandia have been linked to a risk of heart problems, including heart attacks and heart failure.

    Ge’s lawsuit is a whistleblower lawsuit that has nothing to do with Actos personal injury claims.  However, the whistleblower’s claims confirm to California product liability attorneys that Takeda concealed important information from federal regulators.

    Heart failure and heart problems are not the only risks associated with Actos use.  Last year, the Food and Drug Administration issued a safety announcement, warning patients that the use of pioglitazone or Actos for more than a year was linked to an increased risk of bladder cancer.

     

     

    Share
  • Motorcycle Accidents, Personal Injury

    Posted on March 5th, 2012

    Written by

    Access to Motorcycle Safety Information Empowers Buyers

    Two companies are teaming up in an initiative that any Los Angeles motorcycle accident lawyer would support.  The initiative will offer motorcycle buyers the same kind of safety and history reports that are currently available to car buyers. The initiative has been launched by Kelley Blue Book and Cyclechex, which currently provides motorcycle history reports to consumers.

    The Cyclechex program currently allows buyers of used motorcycles to evaluate the safety of the vehicle through a complete safety report.  A motorcycle that has been involved in an accident could have been left unstable, placing the motorcyclist at a serious risk of injuries in an accident.  Currently, buyers of used cars have access to such safety information through Carfax and other similar vehicle history report programs.  Motorcycle riders now have similar, easily-accessible information through this partnership with Kelley Blue Book, making these records available to a much broader section of the motorcycling population.

    All information about the prior history and safety of the motorcycle is now available in a single safety report that can easily be ordered online.  According to Kelley Blue Book, all its users will be able to access and order a Cyclechex motorcycle history report on its website.  You can order the report for $22.95.  The report will include an accurate odometer reading, information about the previous owners of the motorcycle and vehicle specifications.  The report will also include other information about parts of the motorcycle that may have been damaged in an accident.  A used motorcycle buyer may not be aware that the vehicle has been included in a recall for steering trouble, malfunctioning brakes or other defects that can possibly increase the risks of being involved in an accident.  Potential buyers can now access information about prior recalls involving the motorcycle model as part of their history report.

    Share
  • Car Accidents, Personal Injury, Vehicle Accident Injury

    Posted on February 28th, 2012

    Written by

    Feds Unveil New Crash Test Dummy for Older Children

    Pediatricians, transportation safety agencies and Los Angeles car accident lawyers are increasingly recommending that older children also be restrained in booster seats, to reduce their risks of fatal injuries in an accident.  The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has unveiled a new crash test dummy of an older child, that will be used to ensure that the growing number of booster seats being manufactured for older children do a good job of keeping children safe in an accident.

    The agency will use the new crash test dummy to evaluate the safety of child seats and booster seats that are made for children who weigh above 65 pounds.  In previous tests, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration was forced to rely on dummies that represented 6-year-olds.  The new dummy will be used to evaluate the safety of the seats using chest acceleration and head and knee excursions.

    There are now an increasing number of seats manufactured for children between the age of 8 and 10.  Los Angeles car accident lawyers find it encouraging that manufacturers are taking into consideration increasing concerns about the safety of children who are too old for infant seats, and too young for seat-belts.  However, for these children to be really safe in their booster seats, it is important that the car seats be manufactured according federal specifications, and be tested for strength and resilience.

    The new crash test dummy, which is known as the ‘Hybrid III 10-year-old child test dummy’ weighs 78 pounds.  The dummy will be used to evaluate the safety of booster seats that are meant for children between 66 and 80 pounds in weight.

    .

    Share
  • Car Accidents, Personal Injury, Vehicle Accident Injury

    Posted on February 27th, 2012

    Written by

    Google’s Heads-Up Display Units Raise Safety Concerns

    The tech industry is abuzz with rumors that Google will soon introduce new heads-up display units or goggles that can transmit information from the Internet directly in front of a person’s eyeballs, making for a much more intimate viewing experience.  However, San Fernando Valley car accident lawyers are concerned that the goggles, which could be available as early as the end of 2012, will possibly increase accident risks.

    The goggles are interactive and allow the use of a unique personal navigation system.  A person wearing the goggles can control the information that is transmitted by using his head to scroll pages.  The glasses will also come with a low-resolution built-in camera that will monitor the world around the person, and transmit information like location, surrounding areas as well as any friends and acquaintances that might be nearby.  There are several privacy issues that will arise from the use of these goggles.  However, what really concerns San Fernando Valley car accident lawyers is that the goggles would simply amplify the threat of distracted driving.

    California transportation agencies have struggled with minimizing the number of people who continue to use cell phones while driving.  The use of smart phones to do everything from check e-mails to update Facebook statuses has severely increased accident risks.  Introducing heads-up display units that can be used anywhere and that promise a much more involved viewing experience can only increase those risks.  Plus, the Google goggles are priced low enough, which means that they are likely to become popular very quickly.

    Only the extremely myopic would object to the highly sophisticated technology that is being introduced into our lives.  However, it’s also important for companies who introduce these technologies to include safeguards that encourage responsible use and reduce the risk of accidents.

    Share
  • Older Posts Yeah! There are more posts, check them out.

    Newer Posts Yeah! There are more posts, check them out.